A PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGNTY: AN ELIXIR TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE 27 OF THE ROME STATUTE
1 Faculty of Law, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu.
* Corresponding author: chigozieonuegbulam@yahoo.com
* Corresponding author: chigozieonuegbulam@yahoo.com
Abstract
The final Diplomatic Conference in Rome witnessed sovereign States who
sought for a statute that would specifically accommodate their own
particular domestic constitutions. They rather ended up creating an
international justice system that is sui generis in nature carrying the
imprimatur of many legal systems but closely resembling none and yet very
involving. Without assurances of express or implied exclusion of potential
constitutional issues, the overwhelming majority of States that participated
in the Rome Conference consciously voted in favor of the Statute with all
its implications. Eventually, this Treaty established the International
Criminal Court (ICC) and re‐echoed the Nuremberg dogma of individual
criminal responsibility under its article 27. The whole of the Rome Statute
was entirely an act of sovereignty, but history has clearly shown that article
27 of the Statute, though elegant to sustain responsible governance, yet,
for sovereignty, it is a walk in the dark. Hence, criminal accountability of
sovereigns for international crimes has consistently remained an uphill
task, indeed a nightmare in a broad daylight. The question is can
sovereignty be made accountable for its crime. This study aims at a
progressive interpretation of the doctrine of sovereignty and its immunity
clauses as a panacea to the enforcement of Article 27 of the Rome Statue.
The objective is to highlight effect of the doctrine of sovereignty on article
27 of the Statute and discuss the need to enhance global responsible
sovereignty. The study adopts doctrinal designs using analytical approach
with reliance made on Statutes, case law, law reviews and data in web‐
based sources all subjected to content analysis. The research found that
without a progressive interpretation of the doctrine of sovereignty in line
with Article 27 of the Rome Statute, enforcement of individual criminal
responsibility of sitting sovereigns will remain an uphill task.
Keywords
Sovereignty
progressive interpretation
sovereign immunity
Article 27 of the Rome Statute.
How to Cite
Onuegbulam, M. C. (2023). A PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGNTY: AN ELIXIR TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE 27 OF THE ROME STATUTE. Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, 8(1), 445-471. https://doi.org/10.68193/jilj.2023.nckui5k0
M. C. Onuegbulam, "A PROGRESSIVE INTERPRETATION OF THE DOCTRINE OF SOVEREIGNTY: AN ELIXIR TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF ARTICLE 27 OF THE ROME STATUTE," Journal of International Law and Jurisprudence, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 445-471, June 2023. doi: 10.68193/jilj.2023.nckui5k0